Jump to content

Things That You Don't Understand!


FenrirDarkWolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Chaosmasterdelta said:

I have no idea what to do for the question at the bottom. What do I explain?

IMG_1829.JPG

I think they mean explain why those aspects are important in that order. Looks like a misprint though. When it comes to governance, banks & other big businesses are number 1, the government is number 2 and everyone else is a distant number 3.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/5/2017 at 2:07 PM, Chaosmasterdelta said:

I have no idea what to do for the question at the bottom. What do I explain?

IMG_1829.JPG

My guess is that it's the world's dumbest interpretation of the "Of the People, by the People, for the People" thing.

The government exists to serve the people, not the other way around.
That's the idea, anyway. Not like that's a real thing anymore.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It is now the future, AD 2,017. A Doctor of Science is training a new generation of engineers to build thinking machines. She does this by making them draw diagrams of doorknobs using stick figures to represent the various components and people who might use them.

I just don't know, man.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How I'm supposed to use dimensional analysis to do this deriving equation stuff.

First question on this part of the assignment wants this done with the pendulum formula.

The second wants it with deriving units for G in newton's universal gravitation formula somehow.

And the third question wants me to derive Reynolds number from some quantities that make the formula for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Nova said:

Why are deers so fukin dumb.

Like they always cross the train tracks when the train is infront of them and they get hit.

Not even hedgehogs are that dumb.

What about cats? They hide under a bush for two hours carefully watching the road, then suddenly dash straight across it as fast as they can whether anything is coming or not!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the majority of the furry fandom is a bunch of corny idiots with a fetish for being cringey and grody. But I do wonder how people just come across some of these folks in large settings. Like my friend just finds Discord servers and other big ass hubs with these creepy, nasty weirdos. 

I'm lucky that I avoid them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tsuujou's post reminds me that one of my closest pals for a while was a furry that was fairly average, except he wants to be a donkey irl. Totally chill dude, fun at parties, showed him how to make alfalfa tea, but he wants to go full Pinnochio and knows he can't. Settles for making his own human-edible "hay" pellets. Which makes me wonder even more: for every gross, creepy fur with super weird fetishes, how many are totally normal and just have that One Weird Thing they like and only talk about to close friends? 

disney1.thumb.jpg.42ad4f8ca5b9b3fac65bf903d3df460b.jpg

hee haw 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Plants said:

Tsuujou's post reminds me that one of my closest pals for a while was a furry that was fairly average, except he wants to be a donkey irl.

I mean, at least he can straight-faced and seriously tell people that, deep down inside, he feels like a total ass.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Plants said:

Tsuujou's post reminds me that one of my closest pals for a while was a furry that was fairly average, except he wants to be a donkey irl. Totally chill dude, fun at parties, showed him how to make alfalfa tea, but he wants to go full Pinnochio and knows he can't. Settles for making his own human-edible "hay" pellets. Which makes me wonder even more: for every gross, creepy fur with super weird fetishes, how many are totally normal and just have that One Weird Thing they like and only talk about to close friends? 

disney1.thumb.jpg.42ad4f8ca5b9b3fac65bf903d3df460b.jpg

hee haw 

Probably ten or so. The gross side of the fandom is greatly exaggerated. I don't get why people, especially "furries," need to demonize the fandom when, really, most of it is normal. Even most fetishes and porn, while somewhat weird and kind of gross, are more or less harmless.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BennyJackdaw said:

Even most fetishes and porn, while somewhat weird and kind of gross, are more or less harmless.

True but most folks are still gross. Even some furries that make good content that I enjoy. This is about the people and not furry content itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BennyJackdaw said:

Probably ten or so. The gross side of the fandom is greatly exaggerated. I don't get why people, especially "furries," need to demonize the fandom when, really, most of it is normal. Even most fetishes and porn, while somewhat weird and kind of gross, are more or less harmless.

Furries are carcinogenic. It's possible to think animal characters and shit are cool and cute and fun, but the gross side of the fandom is not an exaggeration in any way at all. Many furries will turn a blind eye and tolerate what shouldn't be tolerated, such as shitting all over hotel walls and raping mice. There is no exaggeration when it's all documented by its own participants.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Socketosis said:

Wait, what?!

well I don't have any examples handy but its far from a stretch considering what they already do which is no less excusable or defensible.

Point is, writing it off as an overexaggeration is just being dishonest. You only need to surf ED to find examples of the shit these people do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dr. Doggo said:

Furries are carcinogenic. It's possible to think animal characters and shit are cool and cute and fun, but the gross side of the fandom is not an exaggeration in any way at all. Many furries will turn a blind eye and tolerate what shouldn't be tolerated, such as shitting all over hotel walls and raping mice. There is no exaggeration when it's all documented by its own participants.

By that, do you mean actual furries or furry haters masquerading as furries to seem less bias? Yeah, there is a gross side, but the problem is that it gets zoomed in on, and the lighter, more common side, gets ignored. There's hundreds upon thousands of furries that don't poop in hotels or **** each other in fursuits, but because people focus on the louder side, that leads to innocent people basically being treated like scum, and you buy into it with the "Most furries are gross" stereotype. Not to mention, there are horrible people everywhere, furry or not.

Also, I might have said this before, but there is absolutely no proof as to how big the awful side of our fandom is.

 

4 hours ago, Vae said:

Boy are you on the wrong fucking site then.

I kind of figured this was another anti-furry site masquerading as a true furry site, just like Fur Affinity Forums and Weasyl. ...Though in Weasyl's defense, it only became that way once the FAF members moved in and shat all over the place. I'm fine with not liking every single thing about the fandom, but when people act like they hate everything about it and everything that has talking animals in it, that's when I have a problem. Sue me.

And that's what I don't get, why "furries" feel the need to spend their entire time online bitching about everything furry and anthro.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BennyJackdaw said:

I kind of figured this was another anti-furry site masquerading as a true furry site

what is a true furry then

enlighten us

if being a furry means being complacent in the company of dogfuckers, pedophiles, poz pigs, and shiteaters, I don't think anybody here wants to be one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dr. Doggo said:

what is a true furry then

enlighten us

if being a furry means being complacent in the company of dogfuckers, pedophiles, poz pigs, and shiteaters, I don't think anybody here wants to be one.

There's really no secret: it's someone who thinks anthropomorphic animals are cool and usually has one as their OC. Generally they like to see things with anthros in them. They don't have to like everything with them, however if they absolutely HATE everything with anthros in them and hate everything related to anthros or furries, then they're not furries.

Also, true furries understand the dark side, but realize it's not the entire fandom, nor is it as humongous as you seem to think. Also, pedophiles have little to do with furries.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BennyJackdaw said:

There's really no secret: it's someone who thinks anthropomorphic animals are cool and usually has one as their OC. Generally they like to see things with anthros in them. They don't have to like everything with them, however if they absolutely HATE everything with anthros in them and hate everything related to anthros or furries, then they're not furries.

Also, true furries understand the dark side, but realize it's not the entire fandom, nor is it as humongous as you seem to think. Also, pedophiles have little to do with furries.

Pedos and other perverts have plenty to do with furries because limpdicks keep pretending they're not present or are such a small amount of people not worth mentioning, as opposed to gassing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BennyJackdaw said:

Fur Affinity Forums and Weasyl. ...Though in Weasyl's defense, it only became that way once the FAF members moved in and shat all over the place.

It's almost like these things and our attitude are all connected somehow.

weeee2333.PNG.10fea6095579ae653bdc54eea29830a7.PNG

Nah, must be my imagination.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BennyJackdaw said:

I don't get why people, especially "furries," need to demonize the fandom

Because as furries, it hurts even more when other furries cause trouble or do something gross or bad. People on the outside look at these furries and form opinions about the fandom as a whole as negative aspects of things are more noticeable and newsworthy to the general public. People don't want to be associated with people that do gross or bad things, and whenever furries do something bad or gross, it makes the rest of us look bad to the general public.

Note that while I'm explaining this, I don't personally think that's fair since that just means the people looking at all this bad stuff and assuming such of furries are all just wrong and not being fair to furries on the whole, but this is largely a part of why furries might feel the need to demonize furries. People don't want to be associated with bad things. Distancing yourself from bad stuff and discouraging the bad stuff in the hopes that the bad stuff happens less many might see as a good way to combat the problems the fandom has.

To give an example regarding FA, people took offense to Chase, an alleged practicing zoophile, being made a moderator of the site. Artists, even some professional artists, use FA as a gallery for their work. When a moderator of such a site has such a shady background, that makes the site and those who use it appear more shady. Plus, no one wants when they're searched for and trying to advertise their art to have news of alleged zoophilic practices pop up. If you're trying to be a professional and sell yourself as an artist in a professional sense, its harder to do that when your associated with such shady things. People don't want to be associated with gross stuff, and gross stuff is much more noticeable to the general public than the good and mundane.

36 minutes ago, BennyJackdaw said:

Oxymoron.

You're a human who can't stand humans. Do you really think you're in a position to claim that furries can't dislike furries?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dr. Doggo said:

what is a true furry then

enlighten us

if being a furry means being complacent in the company of dogfuckers, pedophiles, poz pigs, and shiteaters, I don't think anybody here wants to be one.

The same might be said of Republicans, come to think of it. I mean, look at Mark Foley, or especially J. Dennis Hastert, longest serving Republican Speaker of the house, and his antics were very much an 'open secret'...or, one might consider the Catholic Church. Or various college athletic programs, or frat houses. Its not like furries have some monopoly on doing these things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...