Ricky Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 This is a paper I found pretty interesting, but it makes me wonder just... WHY WHY WHY Apparently scientists have found a way to make anthropomorphic people molecules, let's call them "nano people" such as nano kid, here: They can even give them different heads: If you want, they can also dance for you: Or self-assemble on a substrate like gold, in case you have to make a nano army of people molecules: WHAT WILL THEY THINK OF, NEXT? edit: inb4nanofucking :v 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilBear Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossa Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 2 hours ago, Ricky said: edit: inb4nanofucking :v But it does beg the question: Does size matter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
root Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 3 hours ago, Ricky said: WHAT WILL THEY THINK OF, NEXT? edit: inb4nanofucking :v It's dated 2003 so I'd imagine that's been done already. If not, why not?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDingo Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 This is amazing Thank you for sharing this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hewge Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 I just found a new fetish. Hello, fan art. Here I come! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Posted June 19, 2016 Author Share Posted June 19, 2016 6 hours ago, root said: It's dated 2003 so I'd imagine that's been done already. If not, why not?! Yeah it is pretty old and nothing in it was particularly new or even advanced for the time when it was written. And you know why not, if they do that everyone will start complaining about the lack of accuracy around the genetailia :V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatFanatic Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 I've seen micro and macro porn before. This is something different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayke Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Why though? What point is there for something like this? Heck, I've probably wasted enough time as it is just reading the article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Posted July 1, 2016 Author Share Posted July 1, 2016 13 minutes ago, Jayke said: Why though? What point is there for something like this? Heck, I've probably wasted enough time as it is just reading the article. According to them, it was so the standard layman can relate to the paper but I don't see how aside from "LOL, PEOPLE MOLECULES!" I don't think it is very productive, so yeah I agree x3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayke Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 C'mon chemists, get your shit together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Posted July 1, 2016 Author Share Posted July 1, 2016 Maybe they were trying to go for the whole C60 buckeyball effect which won the Nobel prize? (and is much more practical as opposed to "LOL, PEOPLE MOLECULES." I mean, more recently that shape has even been discovered to form on its own, like the cesium ones at Fukushima. There will never be a practical use for nano people, aside from maybe putting on a nano puppet show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.