Jump to content

FurrynetworkBeta


axelthefox
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Deskai said:

ok, since we can't get off of censorship, here is something the Idola clan is gonna say on this:

"you aren't actually being censored, your content is just not allowed there as the site is privately owned they are free to do what they wish. Please do not use "But my first amendment's rights!!1!!" as thats only applies to the GOVERNMENT doing such a censorship, thus why its possible for businesses to do what they wish on how they are run, but anyone working for the government can not. You can still draw such thing, you can still enjoy such thing, you can still upload such things to the remaining two sites being Inkbunny and SoFurry. Understand that the system of "majority rules" still does apply where on inkbunny you are the majority and the second site is willing to uphold their stance of folks utilizing the blacklist feature."

 

I know how censorship works mate.

My point is that FN had a chance to be a more encompassing site and instead chose to cave to a bunch of people having a sook. I'm disappointed is what I'm saying. They are a developing site with numerous options and opportunities to enhance and modify their site to allow for a wider community and instead they chose to take the easy way out of the issue.

A better alternative would have been to say No cub for the time being until a complete and comprehensive tagging and blacklist feature can be implemented and properly enforced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, FlynnCoyote said:

I know how censorship works mate.

My point is that FN had a chance to be a more encompassing site and instead chose to cave to a bunch of people having a sook. I'm disappointed is what I'm saying. They are a developing site with numerous options and opportunities to enhance and modify their site to allow for a wider community and instead they chose to take the easy way out of the issue.

A better alternative would have been to say No cub for the time being until a complete and comprehensive tagging and blacklist feature can be implemented and properly enforced.


Again as I said much earlier "there is no loss" to the cub porn community, they still can exist on two other sites that are fine as they already dealt with that problem. FN can choose to remove cub porn if the community it has wishes for it to be gone. Its just like when a business chooses to not serve certain people, its stupid...but they are free to do so if they wish, if you don't like it then you can always give your business to someone else that will harm that business instead...

you are correct that they do need to revamp if not fix up their blacklist feature they do have and enforce tagging as like SoFurry and inkbunny and even their own e621 does.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 6tails said:

Meanwhile, over on "No Cub Allowed' FA.......

facubstillgoing.png

Yeah I've seen that comic too. The controversy it's stirring up deserves an entire thread of its own

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 6tails said:

Make it! You've prolly got more info than me right now, as this is the first I've heard of it!

I don't, tbh: I've only seen characters that seem (and actually are, apparently) dangerously underage. These sort of ''controversy threads'' aren't normally my thing but seeing how bored I am... I'm working on it. I'll use that image you linked too if you don't mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Jerry said:

All of this will make me go OCD about the proportions of the characters shown in the pictures' thumbnails in my searches. D=

'cause unless they're drawn with the realistic 7-ish heads height, they don't really look 18+ as per human standards.

I'm not too knowledgeable on art but I'm sure you could take a more toony approach to pull it off. I actually saw a video once that demonstrated how changing facial proportions can age a character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pothocket said:

I'm not too knowledgeable on art but I'm sure you could take a more toony approach to pull it off. I actually saw a video once that demonstrated how changing facial proportions can age a character.

Oh I was referring to the stuff other artists draw, not my own LOL. I very rarely draw characters less than 6 heads tall, and if that's the case it's always SFW.

My concerns are more when I'm browsing through stuff say on FA or somewhere else.

But I guess I'm better safe than sorry, and keep it to SFW stuff and select artists who stick to clearly adult proportions. That's what I like to draw myself anyway, so there's no point in looking for anything else as references.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 6tails said:

Meanwhile, over on "No Cub Allowed' FA.......

facubstillgoing.png

See this is what happens when people go crazy about stuff that is ill-defined. There is no hard set definition on what 'cub porn' is. I personally wouldn't even consider the character 'cub' as the word cub means baby or almost baby. So clearly the comic is fine. I don't even understand from what universe "this is illegal" comes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Enigma said:

Just joined it trying to get my name and failed. I'm Enigma_cat on there.

Since I don't want to got back to FA and I don't have any other social media accounts. I'll just post my art/commissions/requests there.

ADDED!!!!

 

 

Also, mobile browsing is nice and all, and in portrait mode it runs like a dream, however, typing anything in landscape mode kinda turns into a nightmare for DM's on that site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Elektranine said:

See this is what happens when people go crazy about stuff that is ill-defined. There is no hard set definition on what 'cub porn' is. I personally wouldn't even consider the character 'cub' as the word cub means baby or almost baby. So clearly the comic is fine. I don't even understand from what universe "this is illegal" comes from.

We already explained earlier, we have laws targetting mostly those under 12, but we still consider anyone under 18 to be underage thus still bad for characters that are underage to be in porn. 

it could also be that we still considered anyone who isnt above 18 "a child", but we also have that stupid thing of older folks seeing anyone younger than them as a "child" compared to them (I'm 27...yet I still get called "child" by my grandma)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
1 hour ago, XoPachi said:

Wonder if the FN community knows there's more animals than dogs, cats, and deers. Because according to recently popular, that's all that exists in the animal kingdom.

That's because those are the popular species and clearly FN's user base is not very diverse. They probably have a very small user base (1000's) and have done things to alienate large swaths of the furry community. I know alot of furs that won't even use this site in its current state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elektranine said:

That's because those are the popular species and clearly FN's user base is not very diverse. They probably have a very small user base (1000's) and have done things to alienate large swaths of the furry community. I know alot of furs that won't even use this site in its current state.

Alright, fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...