Jump to content

Oh No! 'Rainfurrest' is Might Stop Being a Thing!


PastryOfApathy
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, AshleyAshes said:

'Fetish' isn't inherently sexual by definition anyway.  So yeah, you can have a transformation fetish without wanking to it but its still a fetish.

Well, technically house hold ornaments, rosary beads and crucifixes are fetishes, because a fetish can be an item imbued with cultural significance or magic powers. 

I think, to avoid confusion, when people say 'fetish' nowadays we almost exclusively refer to sexual fetishes. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saxon said:

Well, technically house hold ornaments, rosary beads and crucifixes are fetishes, because a fetish can be an item imbued with cultural significance or magic powers. 

I think, to avoid confusion, when people say 'fetish' nowadays we almost exclusively refer to sexual fetishes. 

Im pretty sure that when we group people with entire galleries on nonsexual bros transforming into anthropomorphic turkeys, we have no concerns with this being confused with the intents of grandmas Christian kitsch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a store in my hometown that sells, no joke, Native American fetishes. I was horribly confused for the longest time.

Anywho, the exact line between sexual interest and non-sexual interest is sometimes fuzzy, in my estimation, especially with how many other feelings get conflated with or mixed in with sexual arousal, and vice versa.

In any case, to be clear, I'm not playing the game where fetishes are "bad" and non-sexual obsessions are "good" when I say that interests like TF can be both or either, just to be clear.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Troj said:

There's a store in my hometown that sells, no joke, Native American fetishes. I was horribly confused for the longest time.

Anywho, the exact line between sexual interest and non-sexual interest is sometimes fuzzy, in my estimation, especially with how many other feelings get conflated with or mixed in with sexual arousal, and vice versa.

In any case, to be clear, I'm not playing the game where fetishes are "bad" and non-sexual obsessions are "good" when I say that interests like TF can be both or either, just to be clear.

Well I mean tumblr artists have a black and Muslim fetish so I wouldn't be shocked tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Saxon said:

Well, technically house hold ornaments, rosary beads and crucifixes are fetishes, because a fetish can be an item imbued with cultural significance or magic powers. 

I think, to avoid confusion, when people say 'fetish' nowadays we almost exclusively refer to sexual fetishes. 

Which would explain why I have a problem with it being called a 'fetish'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, willow said:

I should make a Kickstarter for it

we could host it at my house :v

Make sure you have your programs ready. Like "furry sex: Fuck like your fursona in real life", "BDSM safety", "Dildos and you", "ABDL and Lolicon", "Why furries hate Cub porn", etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PheagleAdler said:

Which would explain why I have a problem with it being called a 'fetish'

I've still got to say I am genuinely surprised that your fascination isn't sexual; lots of the images in your favourites [I do hope you don't mind me looking] are sensual; I would have easily interpreted them as homoerotic. 

I'm actually mystified about how this could appeal in an asexual way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AshleyAshes said:

https://www.furaffinity.net/view/15687079/

I'm having trouble looking at this and imagining you successfully pulling off the 'I'm not some kind of pervert or anything!' claim.

On the other hand, I find it easy to see that Troj's interest in fursuiting isn't sexual, because her costumes are just...not sexually alluring in any way. 

Some of Pheagle's stuff almost stirs something in me, and I'm not even into transformation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Saxon said:

I've still got to say I am genuinely surprised that your fascination isn't sexual; lots of the images in your favourites [I do hope you don't mind me looking] are sensual; I would have easily interpreted them as homoerotic. 

I'm actually mystified about how this could appeal in an asexual way? 

Well, offhand, just look at how many ancient myths and fables involve transformation in some form or another. Physical transformation can symbolize sex, death, enlightenment, injury, or aging, or can serve as a stand-in or symbol for practically any kind of psychological, physical, or life change.

For people who are into it, TF might evoke feelings of eustress (fun-fear), empowerment, disempowerment, escape, mental awakening, liberation, or subjugation, depending.

TF fans might get off on the idea of people (either like them, or not like them) becoming better than than they are, or more in control, or the idea of people (again, either like themselves or not) becoming less powerful, more humbled, or less in control.

Some TF fans might just like the idea of wondering what it would be like to be a different type of organism.

Some might use TF to explore their own feelings about their mind and their body, both good and bad.

I like TF myself--have since I was about, oh, 5 or 6 years old--and I'd even have a hard time explaining exactly why.

Edited by Troj
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AshleyAshes said:

Maybe you're not looking at the same image that I'm looking at?  I see obsessions with locker rooms, sports wear, extreme fatness, and transformation.  This shit be perverted.

I was meaning to point out the fact that he was claiming it wasn't sexual when he commissioned art from someone who literally draws nothing but fetish smut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Troj said:

Well, offhand, just look at how many ancient myths and fables involve transformation in some form or another. Physical transformation can symbolize sex, death, enlightenment, injury, or aging, or can serve as a stand-in or symbol for practically any kind of psychological, physical, or life change.

For people who are into it, TF might evoke feelings of eustress (fun-fear), empowerment, disempowerment, escape, mental awakening, liberation, or subjugation, depending.

TF fans might get off on the idea of people (either like them, or not like them) becoming better than than they are, or more in control, or the idea of people (again, either like themselves or not) becoming less powerful, more humbled, or less in control.

Some TF fans might just like the idea of wondering what it would be like to be a different type of organism.

Some might use TF to explore their own feelings about their mind and their body, both good and bad.

I like TF myself--have since I was about, oh, 5 or 6 years old--and I'd even have a hard time explaining exactly why.

My motivations are...gleefully simpler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Onnes said:

Past a certain point, these things are weirder if they aren't sexual. This is way past that point. 

I knew a guy who ran a whole website for 'Giantesses'.  It was a mix of art but also real photos of girls he'd hire to model to pose that they were crushing cities or people via forced perspective or visual effects.  He apparently had a good run!  The entire site was not sexual at all, I don't even think it had any nudity, but the whole thing was perverted.  Simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PastryOfApathy said:

Yeah in my experience it's best not to look too deep into your fetishes. Just jerk off to whatever weird shit gets you off and move on, since quite frankly that's not a part of the brain you wanna poke around in.

I don't think there's even a psychological consensus on the genesis of sexual fetishes, so when people do probe into their fetishes, it's usually bullshit anyway, like 'I am so into bondage because I just want to have someone captive to care about; being a master is an expression of my subconscious's inner friendliness,'.

The one caveat I have to that, though, is that I find the 'trigger' hypothesis very persuasive. 

 

A fetish isn't always sexual by nature and requires a unhealthy fixation towards it. 

 

I think you're using a psychiatric definition of pathological fetishism. 

When furries say 'fetish' they mean kink. 

Edited by Saxon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zeke said:

Maybe, but that would be a longshot. :V

Nah, seriously.  In the ABDL scene for example there's a lot who are nonsexual about it, even those who are literally asexual.  I've also seen a number of people who are just into being restrained, like, just restrained, no real sexual element to it, just loss of power/control.  People can get off on a lot of things other than getting off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saxon said:

On the other hand, I find it easy to see that Troj's interest in fursuiting isn't sexual, because her costumes are just...not sexually alluring in any way. 

Some of Pheagle's stuff almost stirs something in me, and I'm not even into transformation. 

WTF is "transformation?"

Do you masturbate to Optimus Prime and Megatron? 

39 minutes ago, AshleyAshes said:

Nah, seriously.  In the ABDL scene for example there's a lot who are nonsexual about it, even those who are literally asexual.  I've also seen a number of people who are just into being restrained, like, just restrained, no real sexual element to it, just loss of power/control.  People can get off on a lot of things other than getting off.

I don't buy this for a second.

I bet when you reach into a loaded diaper you get a handful of shit and a rock hard penis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Saxon said:

I've still got to say I am genuinely surprised that your fascination isn't sexual; lots of the images in your favourites [I do hope you don't mind me looking] are sensual; I would have easily interpreted them as homoerotic. 

I'm actually mystified about how this could appeal in an asexual way? 

Because it's fun to imagine the change? I will say I do enjoy something called 'rippage' which would be defined as growth of the body, limbs changing, etc. causing the victim's outfit (or parts of it, including shoes) to be ripped, torn apart, and/or destroyed.You're welcome to look at my favorites, IMO that's what they're there for. And I do follow a lot of artists whose quality of work I admire, unfortunately sometimes that means I look at adult pieces, but I could easily enjoy them without the content.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WileyWarWeasel said:

This was certainly an interesting topic. That being said, it makes one wonder how many people are into the even more esoteric stuff such as transforming between liquid/gas/solid states >>

Rubber-melting is actually a pretty popular thing: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/11223533/ [safe for work, but obviously fetish]

The panther's character is actually a remarkably esoteric fetish-sona; he is a partially transformative rubber hypno-panther who is sometimes a cake: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/10769860/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saxon said:

Rubber-melting is actually a pretty popular thing: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/11223533/ [safe for work, but obviously fetish]

The panther's character is actually a remarkably esoteric fetish-sona; he is a partially transformative rubber hypno-panther who is sometimes a cakehttp://www.furaffinity.net/view/10769860/

Sure! Why the fuck not?

People turning into inanimate objects or materials like rubber is just too much for me. I like body horror to a point, but that stuff goes overboard for me.

You've never wanted to be a sofa? Pfffttt...casual.

Edited by PastryOfApathy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Troj said:

People turning into inanimate objects or materials like rubber is just too much for me. I like body horror to a point, but that stuff goes overboard for me.

The rubbercat isn't inanimate, but inanimate transformation fetishes definitely exist. 

Sure! Why the fuck not?

You've never wanted to be a sofa? Pfffttt...casual.

I can imagine that one's pretty widespread actually. For example being turned into a sofa and sat on. 

Edited by Saxon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saxon said:

The rubbercat isn't inanimate, but inanimate transformation fetishes definitely exist. 

I can imagine that one's pretty widespread actually. For example being turned into a sofa and sat on. 

Well I mean I think there's a pretty sizable difference between "being used as furniture in some kind of sub/dom bondage thing," and "literally being turned into something sold at IKEA."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PastryOfApathy said:

Well I mean I think there's a pretty sizable difference between "being used as furniture in some kind of sub/dom bondage thing," and "literally being turned into something sold at IKEA."

The furniture at IKEA have human names for a reason. 

 

Think about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...