Jump to content

AyGee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Phbbt...

Eheh...

Pwahahaaha!

And... and he's offering cameo spots too, just like last time.  Hah!  And it's ANOTHER visual novel.

For those of you not in the know, the fellow creating this was involved in a good deal of drama and skeevy practices in his last game, Major/Minor, which was chocked full of sparkle-dog goodness and copyright infringing characters, not to mention being a glitchy mess in some cases despite it being the simplest 'game' format one could possibly make.  I would hope someone else on the forums can explain that debacle better than I can - there was a big discussion on it some time back.

This one still seems just as pretentious, but at least the style of the characters seems more consistent with less eye-gougingly obnoxious colors.

I thought I should bring this up for those who want to watch for any ensuing nonsense.  As for me, in the meantime...

NnoGhN1.gif?noredirect

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC he was caught using someone's character without permission, put sergals in the game (again without permission) and then started censoring poor reviews.

The voice in the trailer of this new visual novel thing sounds like BBC announcer.

Its funny how the campaign made its goal more or less on cameo spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/18/2017 at 2:49 AM, Azurex said:

When your only selling point for your game is the fact that it involves furries, you know you're doing something wrong.

I'm surprised to see you back.
Howdy.

Anyway, this that slovenly git, Klace? Art's kinda ugly. Designs are as predictably poor as one would expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zeke said:

They all look like dogs to me.

 

Man, you know if it's one thing I'm tired of in anthro games, it's the same basic bitch stuff. Can we get pangolins, a turtle, an insect that's actually not the bad guy, or some kind of sea critter that isn't a shark?
This just looks like it's going to eventually devolve to a typical gay yiffing orgy. With boring characters and mediocre art.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tsuujou said:

Man, you know if it's one thing I'm tired of in anthro games, it's the same basic bitch stuff. Can we get pangolins, a turtle, an insect that's actually not the bad guy, or some kind of sea critter that isn't a shark?
This just looks like it's going to eventually devolve to a typical gay yiffing orgy. With boring characters and mediocre art.

That would mean that furries are a bunch of diverse bunch with a love of different animals.

But nope, dogs. Everyone's a dog. Even that squirrel dragon thing. Dog.

Anyways, I stand by my opinion that there are stupid furries who would throw money at anything remotely furry just because it is "Furry". Even if the first one was sub-par and the developer's someone you SHOULD avoid any contract-like engagements. 

EDIT: Why no Bichir furries? They are cute and personable fish.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've played worse VNs than Major/Minor, honestly. If that's a decent example of Klace's ability as a game developer, then this game doesn't look so terrible. Granted, its not good either but....

There are worse VNs.

Its weird to me how he comissions artists to do the art for his games and they still wind up looking ugly though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Zeke said:

Anyways, I stand by my opinion that there are stupid furries who would throw money at anything remotely furry just because it is "Furry". Even if the first one was sub-par and the developer's someone you SHOULD avoid any contract-like engagements. 

This almost makes me want to get off of my ass and make some sucky furry game to make a bit of dough. Almost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Battlechili said:

I've played worse VNs than Major/Minor, honestly. If that's a decent example of Klace's ability as a game developer, then this game doesn't look so terrible. Granted, its not good either but....

There are worse VNs.

Its weird to me how he comissions artists to do the art for his games and they still wind up looking ugly though.

There's worse, but M/M was still atrocious on every front. The fact that Klace was also a very self centered toxic person about it only made it worse because he wasn't even trying to improve what people were saying was wrong. 

You know Klace reminds me of the Beast's Fury fiasco. That was hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Battlechili said:

I've played worse VNs than Major/Minor, honestly. If that's a decent example of Klace's ability as a game developer, then this game doesn't look so terrible. Granted, its not good either but....

There are worse VNs.

Its weird to me how he comissions artists to do the art for his games and they still wind up looking ugly though.

 

Truly there ARE worse VNs out there, and I have seen/played some while perusing Steam while plastered. If you measure it by the filth that gets through GL, it's just a plainly average japanime weeaboo furfag game made for furfags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Tsuujou said:

Man, you know if it's one thing I'm tired of in anthro games, it's the same basic bitch stuff. Can we get pangolins, a turtle, an insect that's actually not the bad guy, or some kind of sea critter that isn't a shark?
This just looks like it's going to eventually devolve to a typical gay yiffing orgy. With boring characters and mediocre art.

The "everything's a canine" issue is the major reason I chose a weasel to represent myself to the fandom, as a lot of people see canine anthros. There are not a lot of weasels though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Deskai said:

but it doesnt stop someone from drawing that weasel as a dog :V

I fell into that trap once but was quick to learn how to draw the head property when it was pointed out.

In case anyone wants to try and draw one mustelids have cone shaped heads that seem to slope gradually (rather than a perfect 45 degrees) when viewed from the side and look oval shaped when viewed from the front. Otters have the same shape but boxier.

Also they walk plantigrade so if anthro they would stand like humans rather than like dogs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...