Jump to content

Justice Scalia is now dead


Crazy Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/13/politics/supreme-court-justice-antonin-scalia-dies-at-79/index.html

I should be making this a rave. Yea, I'm kinda happy someone is dead? Well, this guy was the most mainstream conservative and religious of the SCOTUS judges. And they're appointed to life on the bench, unless they step down. If one of the only ways to get this guy from making more decisions for our government is this way... well... I'm not going to miss him at least.

In any case, the more important issue is that this opens up a spot on the bench. And Obama is still president. A conservative talk program I listen to has noted that one the most important things for them is to have a Conservative in the white house so more conservatives will be on the bench. So Obama needs to get his ass in gear and elect a more liberal or moderate person to replace him, like NOW. I don't care what Congress has to say on this, 'Bama just needs to tell them to fuck off and nominate one anyway.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exciting! I really hope in the next few presidential terms we can get people to vote for terms for house of reps/supreme court. It sucks we have 90 year old men with values literally from decades ago making decisions today. 

Condolences to the family affected, of course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Saxon said:

I still feel bad about someone dying. 

There is this old saying/showerthought that says 

"Every person sees the world in a unique way. When someone dies it is, in a way, the death of an entire world."

Hence why it's sad

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sucks.

I mean I obviously don't agree with him politically on just about everything and I still think it's pretty bullshit that Supreme Court judges are effectively set-in-stone for life, but I'm not gonna run around screaming "hallelujah" because someone I didn't ever really know died.

That said when the great Trumpening comes around and Donald Trump comes to take back America atop his noble steed, we won't need a "Supreme Court".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lemon said:

Exciting! I really hope in the next few presidential terms we can get people to vote for terms for house of reps/supreme court. It sucks we have 90 year old men with values literally from decades ago making decisions today. 

Second this. Supreme court members being elected for life always struck me as the dumbest thing ever. If they were voted in by the general population it wouldn't be -as- bad. Since at least we chose them by majority vote... but the current system is just a load of bull.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What could be gained from Obama supporting a moderate or liberal presidential aspirant as his hopeful replacement? Every budding politician that sips from the venom-laced crack cup that is the US government inevitably turns into a corporate shill anyway.

Quote

I don't care what Congress has to say on this, 'Bama just needs to tell them to fuck off and nominate one anyway.

lol

Edited by I Did It For The Cat Girls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, I Did It For The Cat Girls said:

What could be gained from Obama supporting a moderate or liberal presidential aspirant as his hopeful replacement? Every budding politician that sips from the venom-laced crack cup that is the US government inevitably turns into a corporate shill anyway.

Well it's generally a wise idea to back someone whose campaign isn't riding on the idea of repealing the signature policy that for all practical intents and purposes bears your name (The Affordable Care Act AKA "Obamacare") you spent like 4-years of your tenure fighting to make law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question, did anyone ever read the writings of Scalia or listen to him during proceedings? The man was very articulate, had well thought out responses. Even if you disagreed with him, his points he made were sound. And he was good friends with retired Justice Ginsburg. He recommended Justice Kagan (and she leans liberal) in an interview as someone who would be a good judge.

President Obama will not be able to get anyone but a moderate (I use that term loosely) on the bench. The Republican party (and some Democrats who are in tight races) and not going to approve someone who thinks the Constitution can be re-interpenetrated or re-written. If however the President doesn't nominate someone that gives the voters a better voice (maybe?) since the Senate is up for reelection this year too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad he's dead. Both cause as an anarchist In glad to see people who decide how to control our lives die, and because I'm glad that a majorly religious and conservative nutcase isn't making those control decisions too.

 

By the way, I would like to remind everyone that, aside from the ones Obama nominated, all our left leaning justices have been nominated by Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rassah said:

I'm glad he's dead. Both cause as an anarchist In glad to see people who decide how to control our lives die, and because I'm glad that a majorly religious and conservative nutcase isn't making those control decisions too.

 

By the way, I would like to remind everyone that, aside from the ones Obama nominated, all our left leaning justices have been nominated by Republicans.

 

 

anarchylol.JPG

Edited by Zaraphayx
My meme was too small :^(
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Rukh Whitefang said:

Quick question, did anyone ever read the writings of Scalia or listen to him during proceedings? The man was very articulate, had well thought out responses. Even if you disagreed with him, his points he made were sound.

Personally, he was a polite and amicable man, but his opinions where not always of proper thought.

Many of his dissenting opinions tended to cite only other dissenting opinions of his, and only cited those in the majority when he was in that majority himself. Application of law and precedent did not matter to the man as much as making it clear that "the function of this Court is to preserve our society's values... not to revise them" (United States v. Virginia 1996).

Good riddance, as pretty much the only way we could get rid of this patrician, unelected, egotistical, unrepresentative, partisan lawyer him was for him to retire or die.

I really don't want those judges to be elected, though, so I'll pretend I didn't insult him with his own criticisms of that body.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I predicted, even before Obama said anything about the death, the Senate has already said they will not allow Obama to nominate ANYONE to the bench, because when Obama selects someone, the Senate has to confirm it. Republicans claim it's because they want to let the public decide, which is a giant steaming pile of bullshit. The reason WHY the GOP doesn't want Obama to nominate anyone is because he'll nominate someone liberal... and because the GOP thinks that Obama's this evil Muslim socialist communist devil who may or may not be the antichrist himself. It's sad how partisan politics have become that if you disagree with a man you vilify the person, not his policies.

In a conservative radio show I listen to, they have said in the past that it's important to get a conservative to the white house because of what Andrew Breitbart said on their show, that because it was likely several justices would either retire or die soon, they needed a conservative to nominate conservatives to the bench because if liberals were the majority on the bench, they would vote away the second amendment all together. Ted Cruz thinks the same way. Really? You would think that liberals would really just get rid of the second amendment, hand out abortions left and right, ban Christianity for good? These people are THAT paranoid? It's what I keep on saying, Conservatives today are paranoid, scared little shits that are afraid of everything. But this does explain the thinking of the GOP and the right. The conservatives are waiting and hoping that a conservative is elected president before they will nominate a judge because that will assure that they will get a conservative judge like Scalia.

 

Also, about his death, I'm not throwing a party and screaming happy in the streets over his death. I'm just glad he's off the bench, as I seriously disagreed with just about every decision he made, especially on things like the gay marriage ruling. I could care less about his death. He's dead? Good. Oh well. People die every day. It's life. His family will have to deal with sadness, which sucks. But life is that people die.


I've gotten to the point where I'm so misanthropic and cynical that I honestly WISH all the people screwing up the planet would die. They're doing nothing but making the world a worse place, so they have no place existing on the planet. I have no power to remove them from the planet or decide their fate, but if they're dead, so be it.

On 2/14/2016 at 7:56 PM, Zerig said:

pls just stop being alive

 

Awww did I hurt your widdle feelings? Were you triggered?
I can't tell what you don't like about me so I'll just figure that you're a conservative and probably an idiot and leave it at that.

 

On 2/14/2016 at 9:38 PM, 6tails said:

He died during a hunting trip.

Wait, was Dick Cheney on this hunting trip? Are we sure it was a natural death? Did they find buckshot in him?

 

On 2/16/2016 at 11:10 PM, Rassah said:

I'm glad he's dead. Both cause as an anarchist In glad to see people who decide how to control our lives die, and because I'm glad that a majorly religious and conservative nutcase isn't making those control decisions too.

 

By the way, I would like to remind everyone that, aside from the ones Obama nominated, all our left leaning justices have been nominated by Republicans.

An anarchist libertarian.... love to talk about that but don't want to derail the thread. I WILL remind you that this is the real world, not Fallout 4, and real world rules apply.

Also, on that second sentence:
Scalia & Kennedy -- Nominated by Reagan. Thomas -- George H. W. Bush. Ginsberg and Breyer -- Clinton. Roberts & Alito -- Bush Jr. Sotomayor & Kagan -- Obama.

On 2/15/2016 at 6:12 PM, Rukh Whitefang said:

 with retired Justice Ginsburg.

Ruth Ginsberg is still on the bench.

Edited by Crazy Lee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Crazy Lee said:

Awww did I hurt your widdle feelings? Were you triggered?
I can't tell what you don't like about me so I'll just figure that you're a conservative andbly an idiot and leave it at that.

Remind me, what's the quickest way to unlike a post?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know why people are so surprised at the death. He was 79. That's a year from 80. Pretty old, America. 

In fact, one of the big things about this election is that a lot of the current Justices are uber old and will have seats up for grabs. Guess this just drives that point home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This issue is going to be important, but we will likely see several years before we feel the impact. I'll wait patiently until then.

16 hours ago, Crazy Lee said:

Andrew Breitbart said... they needed a conservative to nominate conservatives to the bench because if liberals were the majority on the bench, they would vote away the second amendment all together. Ted Cruz thinks the same way. Really? You would think that liberals would really just get rid of the second amendment, hand out abortions left and right, ban Christianity for good? These people are THAT paranoid?

I'm surprised at how many people I know fear that guns will be banned but feel no irony or shame in demanding that entire religions, sexual orientations, or actions be banned.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kazooie said:

you probably shouldn't be doing that to yourself; basking in indignant offense is a dark road to tread

go join greenpeace and harass whalers instead or something

I'm a glutton for punishment apparently.
 

16 hours ago, Butters said:

In fact, one of the big things about this election is that a lot of the current Justices are uber old and will have seats up for grabs. Guess this just drives that point home. 

Imagine if Ginsberg or some of the others retire or die in the next 5 years. And imagine if Trump, or even worse Cruz, is president. If Scalia is replaced by another conservative justice it will just maintain the status quo. If the court is filled with conservatives.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Crazy Lee said:

I'm a glutton for punishment apparently.
 

Imagine if Ginsberg or some of the others retire or die in the next 5 years. And imagine if Trump, or even worse Cruz, is president. If Scalia is replaced by another conservative justice it will just maintain the status quo. If the court is filled with conservatives.....

What a legacy of hate that'd be. I'd rather think of Bernie appointing liberal/progressive judges. xD  Maybe even ones who would over turn money-in-politics laws. 

That'd be a huge gift to future generations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MalletFace said:

This issue is going to be important, but we will likely see several years before we feel the impact. I'll wait patiently until then.

I'm surprised at how many people I know fear that guns will be banned but feel no irony or shame in demanding that entire religions, sexual orientations, or actions be banned.

Big Government= government restricting things I like, or requiring things I dislike.

For me, the truly fascinating thing is how people are letting their (often racially-motivated) hatred of Obama cloud their judgment, such that they don't realize that they'd probably end up resenting a Sanders or Trump appointee more than an Obama one.

Edited by Troj
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2016 at 5:01 PM, Saxon said:

I still feel bad about someone dying. 

why?

i mean really, people die all the time, hell one probably died while i was writing this post. did you feel for them too? or just this awful human being who has done his best to hinder social and legal progress. i will never understand this sentiment. i celebrate his death, and hope that somebody who reflects the values of our current society and generation will ascend to the bench, instead of a self absorbed jesus mongering cuckbucket

Edited by Azure
forgot to add inflammatory insults
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rukh Whitefang said:

So supposedly the President is skipping the funeral of Scalia. Which is a huge snub and indecent. But he has skipped many high profile funerals before so he is right on track.

Presidents skip funerals of government officials all the time, even of people they appoint. What would be odd is if he did not comment on the situation and attend official gatherings about it.

I would feel uncomfortable attending somebody's funeral just because I worked with them too, and even more if I disagreed with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MalletFace said:

Presidents skip funerals of government officials all the time, even of people they appoint. What would be odd is if he did not comment on the situation and attend official gatherings about it.

I would feel uncomfortable attending somebody's funeral just because I worked with them too, and even more if I disagreed with them.

Yeah... Skips a funeral of a Scotus member but has time to go to Clementa Pinckney's, Ted Kennedy's, and Robert Byrd's  funeral. Obama is sending Biden to the funeral instead. Its a indecent snub. Last SCOTUS who past away was in 05 and not only did Bush go ,he gave a Eulogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were Obama, I wouldn't go to the funeral of someone who actively worked against my principles either. 

 

Also: 'high profile funerals'? What, are you seriously judged because you don't go to funerals? I guess if you're the POTUS you are, but that is IMPOSSIBLY petty and pointless. 

Edited by AlexInsane
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AlexInsane said:

If I were Obama, I wouldn't go to the funeral of someone who actively worked against my principles either. 

Also: 'high profile funerals'? What, are you seriously judged because you don't go to funerals? I guess if you're the POTUS you are, but that is IMPOSSIBLY petty and pointless. 

They had ideological differences, but this is a missed opportunity by the president, not to honor the man, per se, but to honor what he represented in America - committed civil service, careful deliberation of the rule of law, hard work, and the ability to disagree with people without being disagreeable. 
 
This is one of the waning chances where he could have been a Statesman, a leader who reminded us of what's best about us and what is best about America, even as the presidential candidates try to bring out our worst. 

Edit: Yes because its a political statement. Just like sending an envoy to Micheal Browns's funeral but not an envoy to Chris Kyle's or any recent police officer killed in the line of duty. Its a snub.

Edited by Rukh Whitefang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...